From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Operation of format-mode-line Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:07:28 +0300 Message-ID: <86cyn47wr3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86ed7k9xi1.fsf@gnu.org> <1Z2IC9_dVlRlp67zGjbXBgpj1BgEOXIj71O8YfjlxhPdnjUctIDsKjImFsqDqvajso47rbfhfvegA2-fSaHnaw6n7RhCRIRICIh0GYkM5J0=@protonmail.com> <86o76o80fe.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35485"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Heime Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 23 21:08:03 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sWKri-00092J-BI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:08:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWKrF-0008LQ-G4; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:07:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWKrE-0008L0-4c for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:07:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWKrD-0003Q9-MD; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:07:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=dYlSZMmyrg8PrZ3rFLF3bygGJ4Sf+kqi76X9mzUnxmU=; b=KE0l49w1JE5E 1jIxOLYJQ5QydroBQeBySGaOgqYsiURlQsdNhISQesDW/K3iLptTa1naT+HZrCkjP3FhAWkZqRwqZ DFwXbdxvknA4Vd1HovENBih5hY4IGlIPPbYa7Mu7jIHnsdYmj4+LGy9mSd7cFybgb8jsOEQ7tTQFL k+iccWAF2Vr5UaO1PDGOWQng5FfjHXcPT14lt6u5b9tUxjFGb1MfJ0gwWDLVxhddm4CfCYwg2JnBh PuKrBmAJjPtd8A5cb2wdrvW/YqL7kZYFi1HABn18WQrMkxVvpwz4HCs7f+T7AiZVprV4ZqnW4TJq1 TLgPKU3KnwFRcnMv913tYQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Heime on Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:56:47 +0000) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147322 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:56:47 +0000 > From: Heime > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > > > Seems that the text properties are the same for each character. > > > > > > They are not. > > If the buffer name is provodilac.el, what is the difference in text proporties > between the different characters ? I see there are faces and code for mouse > action whether I use position 0, 1, 2, etc. All the characters that belong to the buffer name indeed have the same properties. But not all of the characters of the string returned by format-mode-line.