From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:35:36 +0100 Message-ID: <86bn7q8bvb.fsf@realize.ch> References: <87fuxazkfe.fsf@gnus.org> <83io25yeqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hpnreg.fsf@gnus.org> <83y4b0wi7m.fsf@gnu.org> <87si17evk6.fsf@gnus.org> <83twlnvcz2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb63obm3.fsf@gnus.org> <87r3gqmg6g.fsf@gnus.org> <83egcqtfnm.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvrdmk8p.fsf@realize.ch> <877fihjo4m.fsf@gnus.org> <86io20n3xn.fsf@realize.ch> <8760y055l1.fsf@gnus.org> <86wpqfl8ly.fsf@realize.ch> <86si13l1nt.fsf@realize.ch> <87twliiumk.fsf@gnus.org> <86fux28ct9.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455010580 31311 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2016 09:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 10:36:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aT4iV-0007xZ-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:36:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT4iU-00018T-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:36:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT4iD-00018A-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:36:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT4i9-0005B7-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:2940) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT4i9-0005An-8P; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit ([192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:35:33 +0100 Original-Received: from MYNGB (192.168.250.224) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:35:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86fux28ct9.fsf@realize.ch> (Alain Schneble's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:15:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199585 Archived-At: Alain Schneble writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Ok, now I see, thanks to both of you. In the example above, wait_proc > is NULL. Shall it be set to the process to wait for in a "real" > implementation? Together with passing a sigevent struct to > getaddrinfo_a, so the process gets signaled? Currently, this signaling > is not used, as it polls for completion. I hope I'm not mixing things > up... I'm sorry, please ignore my question. I think I did mix it up as there is of course no OS process associated with the network process. Hence, the network process can't be signaled and so my question really seems to be inappropriate...