From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:20:13 +0200 Message-ID: <86bmz54osy.fsf@realize.ch> References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87vaxsjmvu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878tunj2wr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <874m582ixv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <871t0apsxm.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87shsm7hi6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eucwi2.fsf@gnu.org> <878tudgwlq.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360pgoyo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jn3ws9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eqoi08.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475234630 15412 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2016 11:23:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 13:23:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpvuS-0000Vy-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:23:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpvuQ-0004m8-Hm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:23:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpvtE-0004ht-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpvtC-0000eH-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:4327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpvt4-0000cG-Fp; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (Unknown [192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:21:00 +0200 Original-Received: from myngb (192.168.66.64) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:20:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:43:10 +0100") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207912 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > a) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ What about elpa instead of packages? It's 4 chars as 'lisp'. > which is nice because it cleanly separates out the two layouts. > > b) > > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ elpa would suffice, I think. Or is there a reason for the nested packages directory? > EMACS/lisp/unified/blah.el > > which also seperates the two layouts, but would require lots of file > moves form the current system. > > Or c) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ Same here. Regards, Alain