From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from " messages Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:25:17 -0800 Message-ID: <86bm18wo42.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <86sguzc71f.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83y34rc5ns.fsf@gnu.org> <86o95mdd4a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83sguyc4mm.fsf@gnu.org> <868swpdgeg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86k1g5bvr6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87zhp0xss2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86ftqsb0sa.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87muktbp4k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="122511"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 18:42:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hFiD7-000Vh4-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:42:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFiD6-0000l5-Aq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFiCt-0000jh-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFiCs-0003zm-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:54889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFiCq-0003xp-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D381D1ABDB6 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:25:22 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id FhwYhuERpszDUFhwYh5puQ; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:25:22 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 Original-Received: from [76.77.182.20] (port=50546 helo=Takver4) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hFhwY-002DVO-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:25:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87muktbp4k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:56:43 +0300") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host114.hostmonster.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stephe-leake.org X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 76.77.182.20 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1hFhwY-002DVO-K6 X-Source-Sender: (Takver4) [76.77.182.20]:50546 X-Source-Auth: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3RlcGhlbGU7c3RlcGhlbGU7aG9zdDExNC5ob3N0bW9uc3Rlci5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 67.222.33.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235448 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >>>> +--- >>>> +** next-error-suppress-locus-message controls when `next-error' >>>> + outputs a message about the error locus. >>> >>> Is this feature really expected to be used often to deserve the new >>> defcustom or a simple defvar would be enough? >> >> If it's a defcustom, it is easier for people to find, if they are >> bothered by the verbosity. >> >>> In any case I recommend to rename it to next-error-verbosity. >> >> ok. > > Sorry, I realized only after your commit that a better name would be > next-error-verbose. Makes sense > Also this makes clear that the meaning of its value should be reversed - > to show verbose messages when the value is non-nil. Yes, I realized that when I went to set it. > But I have no opinion about its default value, if you want you can > change it from nil to t. On the principle of least bother to others, I'll make the default be the verbose setting. Thanks for your help. -- -- Stephe