From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68570: 29.1; recompile might not re-use project-compile's buffer Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:46:51 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86bk9b6vu4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <920b0c20-c6ee-4b41-84ec-5adfa06c64a2@jbornemann.de> <320b09d1-2af4-4110-bdf3-94da122f3dd6@gutov.dev> <86il3m1zi7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <60842df3-8a64-4bde-b6d6-f94b9a964a17@gutov.dev> <86fryp7ubp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871a3ea4-46d9-419e-a375-1d32968ccc88@jbornemann.de> <867ck0leif.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <0598898e-8e25-43b1-92c0-4596ad242ec8@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13986"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Bornemann , 68570@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 24 09:02:15 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYD9-0003QR-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:02:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCt-0004pO-PL; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:01:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCr-0004oV-VK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCr-0006KC-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCw-0006hz-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68570 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68570-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68570.170608328425694 (code B ref 68570); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2024 08:01:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCJ-0006gL-TH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:49721) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSYCH-0006g5-My for 68570@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62830FF808; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:01:09 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <0598898e-8e25-43b1-92c0-4596ad242ec8@gutov.dev> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:21:50 +0200") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278766 Archived-At: >> Recompiling from a non-compilation buffer has security concerns. >> The patch that I proposed above is intended only for >> recompiling from a compilation buffer. It sets >> `compilation-buffer-name-function' in the compilation buffer. > > I think it behaves correctly inside the compilation buffer already? At > least it did when I tested. Sorry, I didn't show my compilation function: (setopt project-compilation-buffer-name-function (lambda (name-of-mode) (generate-new-buffer-name (project-prefixed-buffer-name name-of-mode)))) Currently 'g' doesn't create a new compilation buffer, because 'compilation--default-buffer-name' just reuses the current buffer.