From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code for cond* Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: <86bk99cwmf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jf3rkzx.fsf@yahoo.com> <87le8ehqew.fsf@localhost> <87zfwurjv4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cytqhn35.fsf@localhost> <87r0i6rfjg.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jf2hkxo.fsf@localhost> <87frymre9b.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qa6hjtq.fsf@localhost> <87y1ceeoo3.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87o7d9pysz.fsf@yahoo.com> <87frylps5u.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cjxedf8.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8987"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 25 15:32:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rT0ml-00024Z-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:32:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT0lx-0004nA-0i; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:32:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT0lv-0004my-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT0lt-0005bg-9l; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:32:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ibBAeqwiM6r2CypFqeqyaq5/1FsY9JyDdzOjwrU42Iw=; b=Sb1LpeqtjBiY B8XUJc9lML8plWGwNodjI1KdUHby3RZp1QvpG0Egthv3vDRMPVgZFk7BSt5YtqNlsxeHSV5MRT5n5 bE/h/qOk+eImQ8G089IHYSDU9caEyuJMYH2vG33zbtE3HvpHjmf3D+H+jvZEPoXKnJLaDj9ilGlPL n+Ky/wyW7Pr6USu+SuzenGyH5Q67eb3XN/lO5VgjQ/E8teXAiCpb7wqyycI5wJWC+WC9IhovhVDfp 3WYvsQH7o2RGf+e/fefj6mNMZ1ExLq1dyw5XtjyctkOvZ2IDKHoOtwFzXWiblFdc9NKCUXb/27xeU /pV5CeVoa/kJ/BU5I0VOLg==; In-Reply-To: <877cjxedf8.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:43:39 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315361 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:43:39 +0100 > > I think most people didn't worry when it was just about > pushing cond*. > > But when it was then said outright that the purpose of cond* > was to replace `pcase' I think people started to object > a little bit That worry is unnecessary, since none of those who said that are in a position to make these decisions. IOW, you need to know to whom to listen on this list, if you are going to take what people say to heart.