From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69738: Followup Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:30:06 +0300 Message-ID: <86bk6bnbzl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4a0215b2e7bb416cf352e867183f745a@posteo.net> <1ed9ea789788d6a6450c86920199b6c6@posteo.net> <8634ronurh.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org To: rameiko87@posteo.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 18:31:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2l3-0000i8-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:31:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2kr-00064j-Eh; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2km-00064a-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2km-0007YG-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2kx-0001xy-Hm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:31:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:31:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69738.17131122365211 (code B ref 69738); Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:31:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2024 16:30:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36057 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2kS-0001Ju-Ti for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2kN-0001CN-W3 for 69738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2k5-0007PO-3H; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:30:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=z1tRVd91lG3VZzpxhqpK5qOXqKcz6Yl49VbyovPx3NU=; b=SIvgxTHaZRso KzIgnC7Q8QTlPAXtyvJt107hFk1HzbDqdu4EaF21EvIV7Gmxe80cXh4pGmle80xQxlMduCvl7wAw+ PsEnGl+E31LwCctRRtS680pjiXXLUE4pWQxNp5XFBxPpznQIj57y20OJ7366cUEq9zT2xJAFs4+oc piDKNFc5lAAzdR1KwN4U2Z7nSD5NUR1Lqz93zFsjRudi0l3XfPZ8yQt7RPaWWbnD8bTuDN14lOU3b uaJzoZxVq0aS651gaci8v/K76EIwBbi/0HLzvIQRw3QMBwFFJVgf6kqfC3rTJHmriKgHMVGCPLeqi 6EKK1HRaGlDsWnsZTgCmMg==; In-Reply-To: (rameiko87@posteo.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283297 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:14:20 +0000 > From: rameiko87@posteo.net > Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org > > Why not just remove the condition of (display-multi-frame-p)? It's > neater, and I can't see any drawbacks compared to your patch (but the > fact that your code insists on switching to other before deleting the > frame makes me think there must be some reason...?) Yes, I have my reasons: I'd like to make sure we switch to the exact frame the user wants -- the one showing the Rmail buffer. Unlike on GUI displays, only a single frame is shown on a TTY, so if we accidentally switch to the wrong frame, the user will not see the frame they need, something that does happen on GUI terminals. Does the patch as I sent it work for you? If not, please tell what doesn't work.