From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No NEWS entry for doc-view-mupdf-use-svg (Emacs 30.0.91 feedback) Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 11:09:54 +0300 Message-ID: <86bk0h5sx9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cyky43fb.fsf@ice9.digital> <86setu5f85.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfo22jy4.fsf@ice9.digital> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: tsdh@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Morgan Willcock Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 21 10:10:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1srvCQ-00015V-9R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:10:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srvBm-0002hj-3n; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 04:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srvBl-0002hb-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 04:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srvBk-00086d-CA; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 04:09:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=LxtlDvSMEuCvaWh5rzKT4hcgHEAw1Tmy4aah8/6Kf1M=; b=QKZGpmmVCBs1 WpVsn8RJ475/568UD2pr0pZd5G+ICR2j0SNS3T/Rby7H247yiJRXqVi0gXI5wUbAFXMoQXXtEt11L 5c+gn5TCl6uWBva9a/3k4WtIfy8MmaKqVPQuqGPha2vrxX0DBoyO8FmZrkcN3dIqh5I9YCarob+7p Gpt0d0kpd+iE8zbBORM1PW8oDuOYTMXDiAht6Gd20hPjcu+128MxQ/STHjfH1oPTkTckbRKiqO1A5 Iz4VROzNwtuwmqYzReHiexTqXCnK5wmub9Frvnku2RHcVMREWMdBwdtA+UdWQHECvoXYdKBQzbeYl 0rKpYinFxHl3QfIBTX215g==; In-Reply-To: <87zfo22jy4.fsf@ice9.digital> (message from Morgan Willcock on Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:39:47 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323883 Archived-At: > From: Morgan Willcock > Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:39:47 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Eventually I found the variable doc-view-mupdf-use-svg, and setting it > >> to nil reverted the rendering to the old method where the text was > >> visible. > > > > Why is that? If your system supports display of SVG images, why > > wasn't the text readable? Tassilo, any ideas? > > I think it is rendering the text and the background of the document in > the same colour. In that case, you may wish to customize the new face doc-view-svg-face. What do other applications, like a browser, show for the produced SVG file? Is it possible that your version of mpdf produces bad SVG images?