From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Question about =?utf-8?Q?=C3=BCarent-frame?= changes
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:39:45 +0300
Message-ID: <86bk0ac40e.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m2cyl19qkk.fsf@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
 <9bc2af0a-d3c1-4ba6-a350-af6e2b85695d@gmx.at>
 <87y13phwbk.fsf@gmail.com> <m24j6d9ebm.fsf@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
 <m2o74c6nrp.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2jzf06l6i.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <8634lnda4y.fsf@gnu.org> <m2setn61ug.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <m2o74b5817.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="27973"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 26 08:40:31 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1stiAw-00076x-W2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:40:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1stiAI-0005AE-N8; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:39:50 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1stiAG-0005A0-Td
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:39:48 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1stiAF-0006X9-Jz; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:39:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=1MwKIC3NI68v3Ax6zRC6XXf4x9rxxNnTx9EmH7J1S3E=; b=OlUgdipsDR1k4TWVl9PH
 rhr2Ibsoh1+OqV0N4jBnsxo71NpWe9Cub6MvlmrSZH8m1BaJG34tXeptB9pY+T2fEEWtbx7FWg/zS
 sCKckyVHGUcThXAFlJicDuxry1VwDTrduJKiZY8RNnuV/CGFtA/mlxnVWqS01Zk4mFZI0L65vmOXT
 LgpQXPKsKdb3hqwXgLgx+opDeIR2pKkqE17tnO+0fEhe0VkcdbgUsPL9a7aqaPIIaju/v3IEHKVfI
 YS+h3C4BPVZBvSnIgVj4fuh6mdNWYs3V2wTBdFg385XMLvaHoI9WrEdzJpMKunB/j7PvQxO5tT4te
 LjqdAqWBLYJZpw==;
In-Reply-To: <m2o74b5817.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> (message from Gerd
 =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 26 Sep 2024 06:54:44 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324099
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/324099>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: rpluim@gmail.com,  rudalics@gmx.at,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 06:54:44 +0200
> 
> I think this this means that the window system itself takes a lot of the
> time (CA::..., NS...), plus redisplay on GUI of course, which I would
> expect to be a bit slower than on ttys, but mainly the window system.
> 
> That's also consistent with the fact that the times differ only a bit
> between optimized and debug builds with checking=all.
> 
> Not much one can do about that, I guess. At least on macOS, it could
> be different on other platforms of course.

Thanks.