Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme

[David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>]

"Mathias Dahl" <mathias.dahl@gmail.com> writes:

>> However, "thumbs" does not seem like much of an advantage here,
>> either.  Probably not what I'd be thinking of first.
>
> A good point. I have been so involved in all this, since I found that
> Thumbs did not suit my needs and I felt the itch to create Tumme, that
> I have taken for granted that "thumbs" is the best and the most logic
> name. And as a Emacs CVS user I didn't realize that neither Thumbs nor
> Tumme has been officially released as part of Emacs.
>
> I guess, as Kim said, that something starting with "image" would be
> better (although I like "tumme" best, because it is the cutest.. :-).
> Both Thumbs and Tumme do much more than just showing the thumbnails of
> images. Actually, the thumbnails themselves aren't what is important,
> the important thing is (or was for me) to have a nice way to browse
> and catalog, look at and maybe also manipulate images.

image-dired, dired-image, vdired...

-- 
David Kastrup