From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding parameters to windows Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:46:29 +0200 Message-ID: <86abi15soa.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <86iqwp5tye.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212580011 18192 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2008 11:46:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 04 13:47:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3rSi-0008RD-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:47:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49477 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3rRw-0005tI-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3rRp-0005sW-V6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:46:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3rRn-0005qT-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:46:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54027 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3rRn-0005qQ-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.quinscape.de ([212.29.44.217]:48216) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3rRm-0001Of-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 4602 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2008 11:46:29 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by quinx.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jun 2008 11:46:28 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3053D8EFF7; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:46:29 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:24:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.3-2; AVE: 7.8.0.26; VDF: 7.0.4.140; host: quinx) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98379 Archived-At: joakim@verona.se writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> M-x checkdoc RET >> >> should help with getting stuff more coding convention compliant. > > Thanks. This was a patch at the C level. Can checkdoc be coerced to > handle Emacs C code? Not that I know of. Sorry for the noise. Maybe one could convert into a pseudo-Lisp buffer and check that, but it is not really the same thing, I guess. It would likely help if one used overlays with modification-hooks on the corresponding passages from Lisp and C that transferred changes in one buffer over to the other. That could be useful for some other applications as well. But the difference between C and Lisp strings is not going to make things easier. -- David Kastrup