From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Fatal error 11: Segmentation Fault Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:50:42 +0200 Message-ID: <86a7h85ru5.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <86imvx5gyz.fsf@zoho.eu> <86ef6l5dwk.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="25068"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 17:57:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLnI-0006OK-29 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:57:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLnH-0000vY-01 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLga-0003i7-V4 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLgZ-00068j-Sf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=54350 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLgZ-00064b-J7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLgV-00165R-Kp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:50:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:9iDSX6N8s25qE0boUx0E7mnGNcw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119831 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >>> 'emacs -Q' works but byte-compiling >>> doesn't complain. >> 'emacs -q' works. > > Haven't been following this thread, but if > those both work then bisect your init file to > find the culprit. > > But Emacs shouldn't crash in any case, so > you'll likely want to file a bug report once > you get a minimal recipe to repro the crash. > (`M-x report-emacs-bug'.) If it is in my init files, how come it works once? I type this using Emacs. Besides, doing a "binary search" isn't so easy. Many files are interconnected. To mot load one file does mean commenting out `require's in lots'a others, as well as functions who uses their stuff, then functions that uses those functions, and so on. Can't I use gdb or something to find it? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573