Göktuğ Kayaalp writes: > On 2020-09-09 18:07 +03, Stefan Kangas wrote: >> This entire discussion seems to start out from the premise that the >> defaults change willy-nilly, when the reality is that Emacs is famous >> precisely for being very backwards compatible and conservative. They >> change only when there are strong reasons to do so. > > I think this discussion is happening because until recently Emacs was > the kind of software where the users were the developers and the > developers were the users. Even if a user weren’t actively > participating here, they were aware of it and how things happened. But > recently we’re experiencing an influx of new users that are coming from > different background and through different pathways who are not really > familiar with how things happen, and clear explanations of how things > happen here could help bridge the gap. > >> I think it would be more useful to demonstrate some important breaking >> changes that we should not have done. > > Didn’t intend to imply such stuff happened. Sorry if it was understood > that way. Just that, as above, there’s a large community of Emacsers > that are not familiar with say pre-2010 FOSS development, with how > things are decided in a mailing list, debbugs, etc. > I'm exactly this user(Also first time posting here). I stumbled into emacs by accident(I looked up "opposite of vim" online and found Emacs and I've been using it ever since). Started using debbugs recently because of the GUIX and Guile projects(that space has a lot of Emacses users that occasionally give tips). > > -- > İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp / @cadadr / > pgp: 024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC 40EB 465C D949 B101 2427 > > -- Bonface M. K. (https://www.bonfacemunyoki.com) One Divine Emacs To Rule Them All GPG key = D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F