From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Cross Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: or-follow-link and EWW as default browser Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:35:08 +1100 Message-ID: <86a65lswh0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877d0wcnvx.fsf@localhost> <25424.307.586213.271185@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87bkq79jrx.fsf@localhost> <25425.21823.245943.699153@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ilkd7tk5.fsf@localhost> <25426.42758.651151.365825@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <874jvx464q.fsf@localhost> <25426.43786.930470.48755@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <871qr145gc.fsf@localhost> <25426.47443.453054.755708@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87wn8s3hof.fsf@localhost> <25427.18585.747123.794306@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87r0z03307.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17340"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.9.1; emacs 29.0.50 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 08:27:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1omqwG-0004Im-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:27:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omocf-0004ON-M8; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omoce-0004M9-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:59:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omocc-0001ty-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id b11so1093879pjp.2 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:59:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:to:from:user-agent :references:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/DNdQmi/xYkvM7WC9cYIw9REwZmDzWPRkY+3dweDT28=; b=O5ZUnYAsduS0v+hvSD1V2sA8yo3Uqi2SAUKy6uf/sXq/w8AIljXGPxkN1EhJO3W65B U6Vgu0KNsWG8XZpBwQrabEhbc9Jm7efWCr0IVTsfIRV91D1RH8Z05Ol+RTFUc+M1gru1 d3k/VYRpf3jCROkmThbiLd1QwNZq2HHp6c3cKx3eu36jQ16qnhwdI+Bd68Z3lwS+F5iP Dtzu2OhQHr5K/uRAz1HxcJDqQdVo6CFlLBfDfy1DIeOsAMqq7Df54piVsJKWYyibhWPY AwYSgtCEIEvu/chrNRwZu1A3K+uhitj0A1lReUP4mrXIOgOGXjnSOvyUsox8GcSGQytp zz5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:to:from:user-agent :references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=/DNdQmi/xYkvM7WC9cYIw9REwZmDzWPRkY+3dweDT28=; b=LeNX3W+Tld4H1Lnvzyg2hQvDYU7QdTeMvR9uv8bpJpP7SGTWNZ8I7jqKCZdHf5QVU1 20TKLNTk7xO/olh2N2xBYSiB+qNI8IPIgdt6x55LBvA6S2oyAe3/ap3OCefQsOqELlSw PzRhLVO8eEoWjL2+k5uaL5EIaC/KJYMnBAi00dWJ9fVdAlyEk2N8nMlLy5/MiDvFILYf 8/+JGnrmoEyzcPbkDAFM/WAHPvWq4cZojS9R//qIa5xGO29deu0zcdMXWgjVSpPv0xVa EeqzW7wgqa6HdiQWOWTq0xUhTn3q8+tzfh+UHGhIvMubcQKHRgCcU9V1wOT85fdtgBLC A+WA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1EK8NxgQ3xreInbJiTTbAJ1cYtU+/oIGBkctVQ6JyNzFOvBjhB rfYGaNbYLMaL49el8MRkRGGBDa2em8Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM69gK6T8+G7IEAd2jYPO8kQAJmxd4gu+oiAU4wfrZ7IBaQknB4YpPc3aWa8jEy9emFerG63XA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c189:b0:186:88bd:42c4 with SMTP id d9-20020a170902c18900b0018688bd42c4mr11206931pld.0.1666583968147; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from dingbat (ppp121-45-155-118.bri-pow-que-bras32.tpg.internode.on.net. [121.45.155.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m19-20020a17090a859300b001f8c532b93dsm5188445pjn.15.2022.10.23.20.59.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035; envelope-from=theophilusx@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1035.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298337 Archived-At: "T.V Raman" writes: > Emacs is built from Github @head > GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 6, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.34, > cairo version 1.16.0) of 2022-10-05 > Org mode version 9.5.5 (release_9.5.5 @ /usr/local/share/emacs/29.0.50/lisp/org/) Raman, I cannot reproduce the issue you are seeing using your recipe. I get the cnn page opened in eww wiht all expected key bindings, including the expected binding for following links. My bersions are GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.17.6, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2022-10-21 Org mode version 9.5.5 (release_9.5.5 @ /usr/local/share/emacs/29.0.50/lisp/org/) The two main differences I note with our versions are 1. My build is from a later HEAD snapshot i.e. 21st Oct v 5th Oct 2. I'm building with lucid rather than GTK+ My suggestion would be to grab a recent HEAD snapshot and see if that makes any differences (I did see some messages on the list about browse-url, but didn't read them as I think they mainly related to functionality on the windows platform). Perhaps there have been some changes there in recent weeks). The other suggestion I have, which is not specific to this issue, is to build with the lucid toolkit rather than GTK. There has been a number of discussions regarding issues and known bugs with the GTK build and given you use stumpwm and are not concerned about the visual aspects of the UI, there is little benefit gained from GTK. IN fact, my experience is that lucid apps behave much better than gtk based ones under stumpwm. I switched back to lucid a few months ago and have been very happy with it.