From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59486: completion-auto-wrap disobeyed by vertical navigation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:47:29 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86a64f327i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <8635aayjm6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zgchbj61.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86h6yoye87.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834juoydlv.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmdcw6hj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83zgcgur9t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59486@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 08:50:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTTY-0001TF-9h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTTM-00073u-Uj; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTTG-0006w2-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTTF-0006YR-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTTF-0004Zu-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59486 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59486-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59486.166936254917533 (code B ref 59486); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59486) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2022 07:49:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTSP-0004Yj-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:57885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyTSO-0004YU-J2 for 59486@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CC4E100008; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:48:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83zgcgur9t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:43:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248967 Archived-At: >> minibuffer-previous-* are intended to navigate the completion list >> horizontally while the minibuffer is active, and minibuffer-previous-line-* >> vertically. > > Then the names could be simplified as minibuffer-up-line and > minibuffer-down-line. It will also make the names less confusing, IMO. It's not only about the minibuffer, but also about completions, so the commands names should also include the word "completion". >> > But one immediate alternative is to use and for >> > the minibuffer-previous-* family, like previous-completion does. >> >> and are useful to move point in the minibuffer. > > Then maybe PgUp and PgDn? PgUp and PgDn are used to scroll the completions buffer from the minibuffer. >> But do you think it would be okay to use and >> for navigation of completions from the minibuffer after >> adding a new user option, when is non-nil (disabled by default)? > > If the arrow keys are already taken, having an option that will change their > effect would be confusing, I think. It does the same as icomplete-vertical-mode where the arrow keys are not confusing.