From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: face-cache Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:05:44 +0300 Message-ID: <86a5lcsa2f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r0eqaslt.fsf@gmail.com> <87mspeas8s.fsf@gmail.com> <87bk5tc1j6.fsf@gmail.com> <877cghc0yy.fsf@gmail.com> <86jzkhu5rv.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjlabic.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8408wsr.fsf@gmail.com> <87il008uka.fsf@gmail.com> <86il00sgwo.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk5s8s66.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 29 13:06:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s1Opr-0002Ks-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:06:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1OpY-0006DF-LT; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1OpV-0006C8-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1OpV-0000An-1v; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:05:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=g2sHk8fVdjrVNeLxTtinPr+v/WOg7aQkCs0NByBjuRc=; b=ShVN0gh+fyGt tgZc3Uc2CeUN4unVVPDyvjiuXj8EeHsw7U3AaPJMDtvKAtduR2v0boEgHnergC+8F0ZC17+o2L7RJ t/NtmD5cLqiB0clGOsGAxBuXOGDvwV8v6RpuqLkyOgc8q8zfsAxG5yEqbv2LU3QEfdE60++cR2fKh 4YD6UftkiVKY5MYQN56GoC0c6mXh/eEM4/cqBfqTXpbK1YWJsNMqlYd8mjVdyElj7ZVLm3vKBtZUA lZvQprKSar9Wp9MZcr5GqG8clz6C4fY62PXgq890fguW0sFOL/na2ykxoK6yRs26HiPDBt8S/5+5N 9W9Asir+/6yP+yo2ym1EnA==; In-Reply-To: <87bk5s8s66.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Helmut Eller on Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:54:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318348 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:54:57 +0200 > > > Are you both using clang or something? The change didn't compiled for > > me with GCC 9.2, because the case in a switch needed braces: > > I use GCC (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > > Should I add some compiler flags? This is the output of make V=1: I don't know. Maybe GCC 12 lifts that restriction or something. I clearly remember that if a case includes declarations, it must be in braces. This is an error, not a warning, so warning switches shouldn't matter.