From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: weak hash tables Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 15:03:17 +0300 Message-ID: <86a5iu4tiy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <-plQctKgNkvp-LJ9ov2QAiXQKxd9V-hI0yz_opRGxQtbknubCjH4rH2-ymgbw_Qr1ZhB1rtlmiEW8XtuIVNr7nR_Yj20AH6WkH6kUGp68g0=@protonmail.com> <_mNcR6ailVKpYHLxgfo_tJlYGeR0AQIzQWluspYYp5_g5pIIKkHLNfFkklQQgOKNiVW8jn8NS3i2dJ7_B2Qyx9v-Dq3MQ9mP8HNL30UWsqY=@protonmail.com> <878qyf4sgm.fsf@gmail.com> <878qye3l81.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13342"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 06 14:04:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sQ49I-0003Dx-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 14:04:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQ48V-00040i-IH; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQ48P-0003vy-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQ48O-0002mn-W4; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:03:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=/S1wjeGGmp2cFlw15dSkDIgBrOn6Hi7AZ4Bpvh6bKHw=; b=YYYvFH16ckWxCmAlVYlt n0nYxcCRUBk8Wk9+omejJtosIm49XZf8Ivr/7LJV3HZFZCx7Unv+Jwq+pELF1i6JVOtEF7tK0Iap6 66hqf3Wb1GdFh30C9avbALiI4tlrmOTc+2C4BHQNQy7I+jmB4WcyTeZbAATi3mUocmJ2EVTOsm/4e lm1olXLS5cLKURIvcbQEmIokeASN63t12E/5eqNN3OoMEe5A7StMQ9ypsWy8QNcrwGCF/9+COivbk GJbr3LfoEeKDzD1RlEyU5sGoj7tffnxsrO5M1O1Vi4OgTf3QduwL4RldxA1PKsK2llrqpYS5R4kHW iif/a75Y/oea1A==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:57:52 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321427 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: Pip Cet , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs > Devel > Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:57:52 +0200 > > Helmut Eller writes: > > > I think finalize_bignum is ever called for something like this: > > > > ./src/emacs -Q -batch -eval ' > > (dotimes (_ 10000000) (set (quote foo) (ash most-positive-fixnum 10000)))' > > Well, turns out garbage_collect called exactly 0 times. > > Which poses the question where can we put that igc_process_messages, so > that it doesn't get too expensive (if it is), but is regularly enough > called even if not idle. > > Maybe_quit, maybe_gc, specbind? Any other ideas? maybe_gc, I'd say. But the conditions for actually calling GC will have to change, of course.