From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags-regen-mode: handling extensionless files Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:10:05 +0300 Message-ID: <86a5fwc4te.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tteaznog.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <8734lrrj4e.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <87o74c1ce1.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7497"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 25 14:11:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1stQrN-0001j3-Lz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stQqf-0006nO-92; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stQqP-000642-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stQqO-0002bT-Oe; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:10:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=xoVB7ex34unzGixIDkmjate/4VIeg0+fz2QCi5Sp3b4=; b=RqYIljcVl6Fr zwUNKjFqb00H9fKB01aZE9c/K1Y/U7+618f8eKc74qLHdO21zV4fSf2AQ7GZ+K0MgP+4a6sS96OCD cjEyVPuqyZY5Lmo5wT+3ShqvK/qchU8jXtcd4gazbfA4eBpCa484mt1CufpOfe46f3R+WmbwheQnY L8qA/3YSCvU+MVWOf+JVzXA/LcsN9udShTRjARsemMGSRrjQDCMFcPcYTXA7OT2nZegHzwI9Flqov /C4T3U/h/hzpOp0SCoC5zTfMSShHoNPMOupCyFzj/Dn+H8qNSsH1iZc8h1zAldc3BKkLerSV2E3v9 qpYuXv8u+3k6UG6MOW5M7Q==; In-Reply-To: <87o74c1ce1.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:21:58 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324064 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:21:58 +0100 > > Hello, > > On Mon 23 Sep 2024 at 08:00pm +03, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > > On 22/09/2024 15:02, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > >>> But see my other email regarding etags' hashbang detection. > >> Hashbang detection would solve my problem elegantly. > >> Is my reading of the other thread correct that if we can fix the fortran > >> fallback then we can enable the hashbang detection? > > > > Yep, I think so. > > > > We would probably also discuss etags' auto-detection and its list of default > > extensions, during the next release's development. > > Okay, cool! Should we have a bug to track this? We could, but adding an option to disable the Fortran fallback is so easy that I hope someone will just do it...