From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: non-blocking connect Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:52:24 +0100 Message-ID: <868y9ap2dj.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> References: <20041101.133846.202527302.kazu@iijlab.net> <20041101050909.GR29502@boetes.org> <20041103133036.GK29018@boetes.org> <20041104131026.GA26116@jkossen.xs4all.nl> <86bre8jqen.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> <86fz3jl3jd.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100073192 6430 80.91.229.6 (10 Nov 2004 07:53:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kai Grossjohann , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 10 08:53:00 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRnHn-0007ad-00 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:53:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRnQF-0007Go-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRnQ7-0007Gi-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRnQ7-0007GV-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRnQ7-0007GS-4D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.129.12.212] (helo=emr1.eu.uu.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CRnHT-0002sq-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from imr1.eu.uu.net ([213.68.123.49]) by emr1.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1CRnHO-0007a9-5z; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:52:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost.uu.net ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by imr1.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1CRnHL-0006MQ-Qd; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:52:31 +0000 Original-Received: from agen1.ams.ops.eu.uu.net ([146.188.97.8] helo=amr.eu.uu.net) by imr1.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1CRnHL-0006MG-F6; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:52:31 +0000 Original-Received: from ketchup.de.uu.net (ketchup.de.uu.net [139.4.38.244]) by amr.eu.uu.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAA7qRxt028395; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:52:30 GMT SSL encryption with TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 SMTP AUTH used user=kgrossjo AuthMechanisms=PLAIN (envelope-from kai@emptydomain.de) Original-Received: from ketchup.de.uu.net (ketchup [127.0.0.1]) by ketchup.de.uu.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-16) with ESMTP id iAA7qP3q009106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:52:25 +0100 Original-Received: (from kgrossjo@localhost) by ketchup.de.uu.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAA7qO9x009104; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:52:24 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: ketchup.de.uu.net: kgrossjo set sender to kai@emptydomain.de using -f Original-To: Stefan In-Reply-To: (Stefan's message of "Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:13:03 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29698 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29698 Stefan writes: >> Difficult to say: it seems to depend on a libc/Emacs interaction. > > Do you have a reasonably self-contained and easy way to (probablistically) > reproduce it? Michael Albinus added code to the docstring of tramp-chunksize that can be used to find out whether the problem is present in the current Emacs/libc combination. Is that good enough? Kai