From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: corrupted ,v files break cvs-to-git mirror Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: <868x7ulm5q.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87lkburb7q.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <46D536A3.3010908@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188380067 10773 80.91.229.10 (29 Aug 2007 09:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 29 11:38:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IQK0i-0001zJ-BM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:38:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQJwI-0007xs-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQJwD-0007vl-6t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQJwC-0007tu-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQJwB-0007tP-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IQJwB-0003Z2-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA27142 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:34:07 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 5204 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2007 09:34:10 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Aug 2007 09:34:10 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 014988FA33; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:34:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <46D536A3.3010908@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv=22?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?'s?= message of "Wed\, 29 Aug 2007 11\:04\:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77319 Archived-At: Jan Dj=E4rv writes: > Miles Bader skrev: >> Jim Meyering writes: >>> Does anyone here have any idea how that happened? >>> FYI, here's the second "1.1" log entry, from "cvs log" output: >>> [What does "Moved" mean? ] >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> revision 1.1 >>> date: 2005/08/23 20:05:32; author: jhd; state: Exp; >>> Moved from international. Old log: >>> ;;; swedish.el --- miscellaneous functions for dealing with Swedish. >>> ---------------------------- >>> revision 1.12 >>> date: 2005/07/04 17:22:27; author: lute; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 >>> Update FSF's address. >>> ---------------------------- >>> >>> I hope it's easily fixed. >> >> It looks as if the stuff past "Moved old log:" are _not_ actual CVS >> revisions, but all part of the _log message_ for revision 1.1 -- i.e., >> the person who did the "move" just copied the entire CVS log of from the >> old location verbatim, and stuffed into his log entry. > > Yes, I did that. How else can we preserve the CVS log when moving > files? Start off the new file with a suitably increased revision number. Starting from 1.1 again is just asking for trouble. --=20 David Kastrup