From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unified project interface Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 05:51:52 -0500 Message-ID: <868u9vjn7b.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <557039DB.4060607@yandex.ru> <5570E86B.8070200@yandex.ru> <85iob2a2mm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B2CDA4.8020207@yandex.ru> <868ua5caz6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B441DD.9060806@yandex.ru> <86zj2jb1tx.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B517AC.5020401@yandex.ru> <86oaiybvbf.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B62B53.5060003@yandex.ru> <861tftaxgx.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B78F49.6010101@yandex.ru> <868ua09s1y.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B7CD86.20306@yandex.ru> <86oaiv8zqn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B9590C.3080108@yandex.ru> <86wpxi6ovl.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55BABE27.4040105@yandex.ru> <868u9wz4mw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55BC197C.3050006@yandex.ru> <86lhdvjq14.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438426349 5465 80.91.229.3 (1 Aug 2015 10:52:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 10:52:29 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 01 12:52:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOq-0006uG-Ax for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 12:52:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOp-0005IZ-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:52:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOa-0005IQ-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOX-0007Ld-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.18.3]:44373) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOX-0007L2-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 6774 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2015 10:51:58 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2015 10:51:58 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmgw3 with id zUru1q00a2UdiVW01UrxjJ; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 10:51:57 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Qc314Krv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=y7kgw_RnJtkA:10 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=x_XPkuGwIRMA:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=vaJtXVxTAAAA:8 a=_eVoIKFhROrMWQINW8cA:9 Original-Received: from [76.218.37.33] (port=63944 helo=TAKVER2) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLUOR-00009M-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:51:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: <86lhdvjq14.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (Stephen Leake's message of "Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:50:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 76.218.37.33 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 69.89.18.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188268 Archived-At: Stephen Leake writes: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> The /** syntax is rather nifty. But why do you propose to have it and >> MAKE-RECURSIVE at the same time? We could just interpret /** as the >> recursive marker. Then the result could be a list of strings. I read this wrong. You _only_ need /** if the paths are _not_ recursive, so this cannot serve as the recursive flag. -- -- Stephe