From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Debugging GNU Emacs on MS Windows / getting control back to gdb Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:08:52 +0200 Message-ID: <868tvqj5x7.fsf@realize.ch> References: <86pop2je7e.fsf@realize.ch> <83wpjaayfs.fsf@gnu.org> <86h9aejcj0.fsf@realize.ch> <83r39iar9z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471806607 26202 195.159.176.226 (21 Aug 2016 19:10:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 21 21:10:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbY88-0006Dq-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:10:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbY80-0007Wa-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbY7M-0007VJ-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbY7L-0004Zo-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:2371) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbY7F-0004Z8-3C; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit ([192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:08:58 +0200 Original-Received: from MYNGB (192.168.66.64) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:08:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r39iar9z.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:52:24 +0300") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206730 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Alain Schneble >> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:46:11 +0200 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Actually, I just found >> http://www.mingw.org/wiki/Workaround_for_GDB_Ctrl_C_Interrupt, compiled >> it and it works! >> >> This allows us to call debugbreak.exe [PID] and control goes back to >> gdb! > > How is this different from "gdb -p PID"? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that works only once, just after attaching to the process. But if I then continue execution, there is no way to again suspend the process and return control to GDB.