From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_ram=C3=ADrez?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: help needed for getting a backtrace ( multi-head emacs_abort on lucid-frame) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:57:21 +0000 Organization: bien.comun.org Message-ID: <868rs2h4u6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86mtgjh13r.fsf@gmail.com> <877d7nmfbm.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y203np3y.fsf@manco.pe> <87v8v7kv9h.fsf@yahoo.com> <86mtgjgiaj.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilr7kmkh.fsf@yahoo.com> <86lew3gd98.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgkjj5ox.fsf@yahoo.com> <86h76qhq5g.fsf@gmail.com> <87lew2khks.fsf@yahoo.com> <86fsmahmfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8v6izxm.fsf@yahoo.com> <86ee1uhkp6.fsf@gmail.com> <87fsmaiycx.fsf@yahoo.com> <86czhehj2n.fsf@gmail.com> <877d7miwwz.fsf@yahoo.com> <86a6cihh3t.fsf@gmail.com> <87y202hegz.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 18 15:58:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngRtz-0002Ij-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:58:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37126 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngRtx-0001gt-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngRsf-00010P-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]:34339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngRsc-0000JA-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id s21-20020a0568301e1500b006054da8e72dso1557045otr.1 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:57:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=feKVaJzKSVHrCwRvGIs4cjR8aLmNsFZMWJPRwLTry+Q=; b=Uhsk+O0+JoHjkRDVIGW9y5FK390YzYJ93IMxcc82B344Y0BCra19Y93Y3StHDYis7c 8wT0Q3t/Nj8KfUrxtw5ukxVbXKpdF+t3fXIU9KkE0PHsLdDY2Ws3t9ZX8Tzezh1gcnL4 ZqIPngLeTcp6aa+FIoQWtL8HNCjybfGhA3La3GnhcV84pR0/A0lQofSTiU510BTv5D04 ZLz1TjQipjla/KCOpBeGFK6ZBYVATdYWd0sh05swoilE3Og4f4DsCuuaRtry3okpcZa5 UmTh7rAB3RiPGbUTd8mcdBtLZjvKfdbItUOGqdEDvPQOTaZkCQ6Cb2vs/4Dm3NrpqHPQ DRkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization :references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=feKVaJzKSVHrCwRvGIs4cjR8aLmNsFZMWJPRwLTry+Q=; b=amOhM8XPOey5rTab0wsm2n/IRPEpvvZXxHBDYaoWzFHiWf793RovydmkiBEYsWuxx2 q/1JAjWW8hxJs/554CwKhRiqwjWraIrnLr3m8XYmSXmcVCDwr8cDIpSqQsqlnOKYCZ/S BUcHwalXV8FUHshbgAfna9zSkPnSBDP0bLjbEmUAgDv7mI7ICVPEAQzj90VjgZA5RmH4 oY6z+p/xNHFVAHiJ/tBPTv/lNPjRBrxxPQvGVCtxNBN6wyaDzDmOQLvv8ecJrBCS6q8R 91Xn9NxEm0MnlzIBtXrSPNnPWwqVJuR9MiboQqpASLMmes5pzfeWkEhjbwJqmPBmUf5u sNYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BZsI2Z8yub6o9Mjd1aWcm55G5fjgMRtUun25+xYQm2nTInbc8 MlDsnkMXb0qkfHiy8fIZR3GDG+iz2fo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnR0zMN9WkG5L7llvLGZI94axmwCE5FNZ0Ywo+ZC1SYVvqlBb6kxktF7/s4BKsanhhcRGVyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:40af:b0:605:518e:e78b with SMTP id x47-20020a05683040af00b00605518ee78bmr261885ott.133.1650290245318; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sacsa.n800.arm.processor.yandex.fm ([190.237.25.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pk16-20020a0568704c1000b000e2d0a4cd6esm3999928oab.29.2022.04.18.06.57.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y202hegz.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Attribution: INKA Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e; envelope-from=rrandresf@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x32e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288623 Archived-At: Hi. Po Lu. >>>>> "Po" == Po Lu writes: [...] Po> What about this? This patch also does NOT fix it. But I have noticed inside x_error_quiter there is a message about ignoring BadName errors. Could this kind of X error be ignored safely also?. JIC. See: ,---- [ ] | commit b823e2f68ff613b2c4f537aba6bbbcf413412eb2 | Author: Chris Wilson | Date: Sun Apr 8 23:09:31 2007 +0100 | | cairo-xlib-surface - propagate status returns. | | These were found during a cairo_static pass on an alternative branch... | | A critical one in particular was setting the have added glyph flag to | TRUE even if _cairo_xlib_surface_add_glyph() fails. This can cause an | application crash due to a RenderBadGlyph error later when the scaled | font is cleaned and we attempt to remove the glyph. `---- https://opensource.apple.com/source/X11libs/X11libs-40/cairo/cairo-1.8.6/ChangeLog.pre-1.6 Best Regards