all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
Cc: 62700@debbugs.gnu.org, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>
Subject: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:18:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <868rema032.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ierfs8uzebf.fsf@janestreet.com> (Spencer Baugh's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:52:20 -0400")

>>>> It just needs more testing for different categories of completion.
>>>
>>> Which categories do you have in mind?
>>
>> Actually, I can't find categories where it could fail.
>> So your patch looks safe to push.
>
> Can we go ahead and push it to Emacs master, then?  I will work on the
> changing-only-new-code backport for Emacs 29 as Eli requested.

But your patch changes only new code.

>>>> Maybe you could find another heuristic for insertion of completion?
>>>> The code is located in the same function 'minibuffer-completion-help':
>>>>
>>>>   (if (and (stringp start) (stringp end))
>>>>       (progn
>>>>         (delete-minibuffer-contents)
>>>>         (insert start choice)
>>>>         ;; Keep point after completion before suffix
>>>>         (save-excursion (insert end)))
>>>>
>>>> Currently it keeps point before the suffix.
>>>
>>> I will try. Although this is a case where completion-base-position feels
>>> more suited than completion-base-affixes...
>>
>> Can you get the same info about positions by calculating the
>> lengths of prefix/choice/suffix?
>
> Hm I have thought about it but I can't see a simple heuristic.
>
> It's not actually clear what behavior we want, anyway.  When TAB
> completes a string fully, it sends point to the end of the buffer.  This
> happens even if completion-cycle-threshold is non-nil, and
> completion-cycle-threashold feels like a pretty similar feature to
> minibuffer-{previous,next}-completion. So maybe that's correct for us to
> do here too?
>
> But a different behavior feels like it could also makes sense.  For
> example, if I'm completing from ffap-|-path (| is point), I'm just
> cycling between ffap-bib-path, ffap-c++-path, ffap-c-path, and it feels
> like as I cycle through those, point should stay right before "-path",
> like ffap-bib|-path, ffap-c++|-path, ffap-c|-path.  No idea how to
> achieve this behavior though.

This also makes sense: ffap-|bib-path, ffap-|c++-path, ffap-|c-path.
I tried it with this tentative patch and it feels quite natural,
so maybe could be turned into an option:

diff --git a/lisp/minibuffer.el b/lisp/minibuffer.el
index a6af65dfa14..733f7710378 100644
--- a/lisp/minibuffer.el
+++ b/lisp/minibuffer.el
@@ -2366,6 +2371,7 @@ minibuffer-completion-help
   (let* ((start (or start (minibuffer--completion-prompt-end)))
          (end (or end (point-max)))
          (string (buffer-substring start end))
+         (pos (1- (point)))
          (md (completion--field-metadata start))
          (completions (completion-all-completions
                        string
@@ -2493,7 +2503,8 @@ minibuffer-completion-help
                                        (delete-minibuffer-contents)
                                        (insert start choice)
                                        ;; Keep point after completion before suffix
-                                       (save-excursion (insert end)))
+                                       (save-excursion (insert end))
+                                       (move-to-column pos))
                                    (unless (or (zerop (length prefix))
                                                (equal prefix
                                                       (buffer-substring-no-properties

> Anyway, the behavior with my earlier patch now feels fine to me, I don't
> think we need any improvements to point's behavior for now.

Maybe your patch still could be pushed to emacs-29 because it fixes
the new feature.





  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b921ea5c-71a2-4e8f-b1cf-dd26831f8104@email.android.com>
2023-04-10 18:20 ` bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 16:52   ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 18:18     ` Juri Linkov [this message]
2023-04-20 18:46       ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 19:00         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-21 18:56           ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 10:48             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 12:57               ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 13:15                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 21:38                   ` sbaugh
2023-04-23  6:13                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-23 11:48                       ` sbaugh
2023-04-24 11:22                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-02 15:13               ` sbaugh
2023-05-02 17:57                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-08 15:48                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-08 16:11                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-03  0:58                       ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-04  7:09                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 10:51                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-12 18:27                         ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13  2:32                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 16:54                             ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 16:59                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 20:59                                 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-14 17:32                                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-03 17:37                                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-04  0:30                                     ` sbaugh
2023-09-04  6:51                                       ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-14  7:39                                     ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-15 17:42                                       ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:51       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 17:56 Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 18:58   ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 19:30     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 20:42       ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-04-06 18:55 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-06 19:22   ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-07 16:37     ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-07 21:02       ` sbaugh
2023-04-08  6:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 10:58           ` sbaugh
2023-04-08 13:19             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:36           ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-08 19:32             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-09 16:40               ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-09 17:38                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:30         ` Juri Linkov
     [not found]   ` <ierbk6lup79.fsf@janestreet.com>
2024-04-07 17:16     ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=868rema032.fsf@mail.linkov.net \
    --to=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=62700@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=sbaugh@catern.com \
    --cc=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.