From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving EQ Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:09:06 +0200 Message-ID: <868qskzpkd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h679kftn.fsf@protonmail.com> <86frmt1k6w.fsf@gnu.org> <871pydjo23.fsf@protonmail.com> <87ed2ciylb.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6565"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acorallo@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 20:10:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tLoZY-0001YN-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 20:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLoZ5-0003V6-3h; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:09:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLoZ0-0003S3-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLoYx-0000jZ-Uo; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:09:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=RyokXng/P/iHUTTxO20QxXcCKdPQwgzPsonL6L10Zu0=; b=rnk+cGMumQXEkkispeXi ZAtLzKPJCl0Lk5UcXZanI/5pAg9SbFoyg0SZX9ymBhpEQx0Se9HIceaCYSsXMBlIyN4955EdesaEb UjmV6lS6jQTCjognBR+tvVJgRkeJ43zEQGP6LJ7qZtQxQTdqHAjP/ymlvRcvuPBBsL6v0epJbaGCk H2+83lg+7WVQkNar3BTOlJs8+wEkZ3d+Gqaj7eMJIMtUFtbd+E11C1Dsyy8s7NZiayipZX/0irp92 +BPC+vMAeDG7ARZqJdWzyBcVZEwnwwpx1aPDdTHTQVCYFfSqsyR151UaI4PVC9tPuVm8zGXGm4BYX lvQOHwA7Aa8NRw==; In-Reply-To: <87ed2ciylb.fsf@protonmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:46:55 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326440 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:46:55 +0000 > From: Pip Cet > Cc: "Pip Cet via \"Emacs development discussions.\"" , Eli Zaretskii , Mattias Engdegård , Paul Eggert > > "Andrea Corallo" writes: > > >> Considering the point of the optimization was to make compilation (when > >> symbols_with_pos_enabled is true) slower, but speed up non-compilation > >> use cases, I think that may be the opposite of what we want :-) > > > > Glad you finally agree on the goal of the optimization. > > I find that statement to be offensive, because you know it to be > factually incorrect; but even if it weren't, gloating like that is > extremely poor form for a maintainer. I'm quite sure Andrea meant it as tongue-in-cheek, nowhere near gloating. Please keep in mind that for Andrea and others here, English is not their first language, and their choice of words could reflect that.