From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 19:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: <868qrzsojd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org> <87ldvzg7vi.fsf@protonmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spd@toadstyle.org, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 28 18:31:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tRaek-0009xh-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:31:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRaeL-000495-6X; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRaeI-00048b-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:30:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRaeH-0007R5-KJ; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:30:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=JKCiiMmyYfFS/YrbekabRhsKCkEvKEzm0ASzPJc7XL4=; b=GQxkuZ4THhyB idvbyZxpPWiDFXFJxtngYzs462dIDc1jYQ+NgsL8wmHUhRo9rtMPblKaho34Sphbop35qx7y56kyN Gi7PI9mbaO012xf8NLPT5J2mod0djZd8zYj5Uw02lV91MHNqNFVBFllRQfWKwDbfPZtfs/TcXDj5H FX/N5Y5BbKt7X87JqHzYBvUAHtdnDZHrj9NMSkD3FWvoQGM0NhU+4Gh6gb6MUWMBinEHf5Cly7XsL DdugFZWU8eMKV27LXTF7m8LmgOCRpVmBriZaUDfWj5f63WuYzIN5qudwVcJBfETP7itj6PWvY+3tK s8QgOnq+O7X9H0hM91dWAw==; In-Reply-To: <87ldvzg7vi.fsf@protonmail.com> (emacs-devel@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327279 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:12:23 +0000 > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." > > I think we probably need to put instrumentation in the source code, so > we gain some idea of how long signals are delayed for when we mark them > pending. What do we expect to learn from this, except the timing of the OS scheduler?