From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:18 +0200 Message-ID: <867f9t4n4t.fsf@realize.ch> References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87vaxsjmvu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878tunj2wr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <874m582ixv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <871t0apsxm.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87shsm7hi6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eucwi2.fsf@gnu.org> <878tudgwlq.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360pgoyo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jn3ws9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eqoi08.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475236625 8025 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2016 11:57:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:57:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 13:57:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpwQx-0000rw-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpwQv-00025N-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpwQp-00024M-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpwQn-0002By-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:4343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpwQi-0002Ar-9u; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (Unknown [192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:35 +0200 Original-Received: from myngb (192.168.66.64) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:43:10 +0100") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207913 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > After that, where blah.el is a package in core format, and foo.el is a > package in elpa format, we can do: > > a) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/packages/foo/foo.el > > which is nice because it cleanly separates out the two layouts. > > b) > > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el > EMACS/lisp/unified/blah.el > > which also seperates the two layouts, but would require lots of file > moves form the current system. > > Or c) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el > > which keeps all the lisp files under the lisp top-level dir, does not > require file moves, but pushes the two directory structures together, > complicating the build. > There's also d) where an elpa package would just go into it's corresponding directory under EMACS/lisp, e.g. EMACS/lisp/org if org is an elpa package. Of course, there's a chance of name clashes here, but both GNU Emacs and GNU elpa are under the same control IIUC. Alain