From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for emacs-30? Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:41:43 +0300 Message-ID: <867cb67888.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y13mznw9.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <86h6aa7gw1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ploya1hc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17100"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 20 15:42:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1srdu0-0004Gb-55 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:42:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srdtk-0000J0-36; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srdti-000099-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1srdth-0000HP-Hs; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:42:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=DDvdQG2gemso5CiTXwjWWsWWufMRXMJa2Ydf2tOsJvw=; b=AaoZIn23jOKS WUfEeJBR72Oh3QYq7m9HTkAHUIKY6aIxkXS1Vo+GwB/F7vaDTDTQ96eBwYtML1LSBeGJOVGGoQ2my a7IAlsVQ+WnplG/Lgi6fau0JeIsgtQr3MFrHfnYFDHSHKZHjyPsue7SyhKc4P/jRG/uVaq3Yaxzs9 fVrXCqfIdnjqlGptRsXEf3bLyfVq7YkugLSoyI/z18UMrRJuqwPhfEx7HTulRjUftR+y80Jyxz/Kv bSe/NcWyrw/jFZY3oZ6cIHgkqe0zGPREM6MyPkEsEl0ZV99LHfOuJOssuvAl7jufkm7MvmkhAzCjF 7Jr2MOyRVzlazrcDJ2lvaQ==; In-Reply-To: <87ploya1hc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:39:11 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323841 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:39:11 +0100 > > Hello, > > On Fri 20 Sep 2024 at 01:34pm +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Sean Whitton > >> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:15:50 +0100 > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Can I install this simple change on the release branch, please? > >> > >> -- >8 -- > >> --- > >> lisp/progmodes/etags-regen.el | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/etags-regen.el b/lisp/progmodes/etags-regen.el > >> index 21ea9bfb8b3..e97b0cd7574 100644 > >> --- a/lisp/progmodes/etags-regen.el > >> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/etags-regen.el > >> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ etags-regen-regexp-alist > >> ;; http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-01/msg00323.html > >> (defcustom etags-regen-file-extensions > >> '("rb" "js" "py" "pl" "el" "c" "cpp" "cc" "h" "hh" "hpp" > >> - "java" "go" "cl" "lisp" "prolog" "php" "erl" "hrl" > >> + "java" "go" "cl" "lisp" "prolog" "php" "erl" "hrl" "pl" "pm" > >> "F" "f" "f90" "for" "cs" "a" "asm" "ads" "adb" "ada") > >> "Code file extensions for `etags-regen-mode'. > > > > We already have "pl" in the list. Adding "pm" is okay, but then why > > only it? why not add all the extensions that 'etags' supports? > > Okay thanks, I'll add "pm" so we don't have just one Perl extension, and > hopefully we can figure out a better solution for master. My question about adding more extensions was for emacs-30. Let's wait for Dmitry to chime in, and take it from there.