From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version' Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:03:49 +0200 Message-ID: <86646mib0q.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <2cd46e7f0705101124r72000f78xdf05d18ca815ca57@mail.gmail.com> <17991.47259.210100.801472@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179752770 13040 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2007 13:06:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, rms@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 21 15:06:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hq7aC-0003qM-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq7aB-0004uz-H4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq7YH-00031c-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq7YF-00030V-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq7YF-00030G-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq7YE-00025n-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13150 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:03:43 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 24412 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 13:03:49 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 May 2007 13:03:49 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 234BC8F832; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:03:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon\, 21 May 2007 08\:59\:12 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71498 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> It seems wasteful to have a file just for this define-package. Why >> not get the info out of the .el files just as for a one-file package? > > I don't think the waste is very significant. Butm I agree that > package.el could simply look for a define-package call in every .el > file. And it could simply report an error if there are 2 or more > such calls. Could also be information in a comment, properly formatted. -- David Kastrup