From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:34:55 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8663qk3g0w.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <20080729222754.GC2208@muc.de> <86myjx3lt8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <48921019.6030308@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217604650 6932 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 15:30:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Romain Francoise To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 17:31:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOwbT-0006wq-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:31:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59474 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwaZ-00085e-8r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwaU-00083l-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwaR-00081e-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49141 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwaQ-00081H-7t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38981 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOwaP-0002db-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwaF-0003xB-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:30:23 +0000 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:30:23 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:30:23 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y/KQipLR1W+UBzXqbtCLDE8Bo18= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101898 Archived-At: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:18:49 +0200 "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" wrote: LB> [automating builds] was discussed before, but I do not know what LB> happened then LB> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-04/msg01011.html I see it working at http://build.orebokech.com/ Romain Francoise is the maintainer, it seems. Romain, can you set up build failures to be aggregated? I can set up buildbot (send me your setup if you can) for a confirmation run; if both our builds fail then the Emacs CVS trunk is probably broken. If buildbot doesn't support this, I can write a simple mail filter to handle it. The important thing is to send a notice only when the build breaks (after 15 minutes or so, in case we miss an immediate fix commit) and another one when it's back. We definitely don't want e-mails on every commit. Ted