From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: NextStep (OSX) install not quite right in HEAD Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:59:01 -0700 Organization: Stonehenge Consulting Services; Portland, Oregon, USA Message-ID: <8662y5u1bu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284657883 19766 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2010 17:24:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 16 19:24:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwIBj-00089X-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:24:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwIAE-0000cF-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33887 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwHax-0002s9-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwGrf-0004Py-C6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:59:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:42068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwGrf-0004Pb-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwGrd-0004kS-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:59:09 +0200 Original-Received: from red.stonehenge.com ([208.79.95.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:59:09 +0200 Original-Received: from merlyn by red.stonehenge.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:59:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: red.stonehenge.com x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.12.13; tzolkin = 9 Ben; haab = 6 Chen User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:d0Gj5ydiqS47AhrRKhxM/w0LWiY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130256 Archived-At: I have a script that either does: make clean bootstrap install or make all install on my git-derived source repo. I generally will do the clean/bootstrap route when I'm bisecting, or I think Configure has changed. But most of the time, I've been updating with the latter, and it seemed to work. Recently, I've noticed that "make all install" is *insufficient* to update my binary inside Emacs.app. Could it be the presence of "emacs-24" in the makefile in a few places? Does that ring any bells? I don't quite understand all the steps this goes through to get something installed. Or am I using the wrong commands above? What command do I issue after updating my source dir to build the least number of steps to update my Emacs.app binary? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion