From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 05:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <865zpr2t2r.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <06d1ac99-55be-0fe5-8cf5-85456762f699@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="233890"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 31 05:37:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLz-000yil-LY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:37:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLy-00026D-KO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLg-00023s-6Q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLf-0005WG-2S for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40276 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLe-0005Q7-SF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWYLb-000yE5-HH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:36:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:UzD8pDCtlIuLAEjpjWY3P/kJVC4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120709 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > I strongly disagree: as somebody who like > instant gratification, I see that Emacs > provides significant advantages to us: fast > ability to see how it works and why, to > change its behavior in an instance, to > experiment without > recompiling/restarting/whatever. Interesting... Perhaps many, if not most people like their gratification instantly, it is rather the gratification in particular that differs? This > change its behavior in an instance, to > experiment without > recompiling/restarting/whatever. also appealed to me in a huge way BTW. And I think that appeal came pretty instantly. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal