From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14729: [External] : bug#14729: 24.3.50; Isearch oddity Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:33:12 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <865ys2yt5z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87mwqbay6p.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87haggmv72.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87h7bpqb6q.fsf@gnus.org> <865ys4taxv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pmqcxbwn.fsf@gnus.org> <86bl1vbcqw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877dcipzsq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "14729@debbugs.gnu.org" <14729@debbugs.gnu.org>, Dani Moncayo To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 10:40:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1muAU0-0002Hv-15 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 10:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muATy-0001R4-UL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:40:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muATa-0001QQ-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muATa-0008Vv-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muATa-000690-49 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14729 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 14729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14729.163878358923575 (code B ref 14729); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2021 09:39:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muATM-00068B-NN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:49307) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muATK-00067d-W5 for 14729@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3A1EFF80E; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:39:39 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2021 02:09:32 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221731 Archived-At: >> > Honestly, I have no idea what is right and what >> > is wrong in this situation >> >> Me neither, but it's not quite optimal the way it is now. > > That exchange is telling. > > As I suggested, let users control the behavior > (Isearch+ does that). Don't look for a single > behavior that's "right" for everyone in all > contexts. This means adding a new user option for this small detail?