From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:49:39 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <865yeftcr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86a63vi2lu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4a78ffcc-15fb-27ac-48b9-82fe84c596aa@yandex.ru> <86bko9na29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bko9u8yy.fsf@gnu.org> <0c3df029-1e0b-7965-59c2-062018a0af7a@yandex.ru> <838rjdu7np.fsf@gnu.org> <3eb92bd5-7552-0529-19a7-b9db315b382a@yandex.ru> <83359lu5o6.fsf@gnu.org> <70602760-546c-0c7c-b4a9-fdfe8d2c4e5e@yandex.ru> <83wn6xsme7.fsf@gnu.org> <86359ksj29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83mt7sr0pu.fsf@gnu.org> <86k02wpl1n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h6y0qyqv.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmcoo5ex.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bko8qy6z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 18:52:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p59SQ-0005Nu-N4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:52:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rn-0003Kn-DN; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rk-0003CQ-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rh-0005fV-Rh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rh-0000qF-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.16709538653209 (code B ref 59935); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 17:51:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Qn-0000pg-3R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:32923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Ql-0000op-NO; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A61E0009; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:50:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83bko8qy6z.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2022 20:22:28 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250869 Archived-At: close 59935 29.0.60 thanks >> Then support for a function in BUFFER-LIST should be implemented >> in emacs-29? (while keeping the recently added PREDICATE argument) > > Yes. Why not? It cannot possibly hurt any existing callers, because > they won't use a function. Right? So now pushed to emacs-29 and closed.