From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TAGS completion with (setq-local completion-ignore-case t) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 12:49:09 +0200 Message-ID: <865xxy2u6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87frx2qu8z.fsf@ice9.digital> <868r2u2x4u.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk7qqsdk.fsf@ice9.digital> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26609"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Morgan Willcock Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 07 11:50:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riBKJ-0006gU-VB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riBJL-0001WV-3r; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 05:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riBJJ-0001WI-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 05:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riBJJ-00079A-2v; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 05:49:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=cRHrS8C2WfekvaWiad50efYDMwr83qU5O+zLx7rhqe0=; b=Hdqu7GsGoVKX xPBd2oPheUueeFy4gr0hhc1JuO5oCPMVSwV8gBOd4drFjtSUMcbyZCxExDM/CriDGpZXlRoJc7r1v XXkgzCTMBK3ml3cKkBdDRLfeMC1r16VPCU4O1ag+LHeot6xoSvNtv22DiRWlTKrerUL2elCPBvgjy RNzOwftE44OWnhhA/dLaIE8QLulVkre9YXRxOJwgLnQF7RmsEB+Jb5kDQ599HEc0bMhmoZE8rCF8P bWJYSdsNoA8rZ6XOH1YQwaigYQCBYLKOBF6eSo0Z2lwOVI+S9eM5SFtdpg9mdJmfxgFd2Cl2WHT5B k19CaMHOXp8xijg5sWkUPg==; In-Reply-To: <87bk7qqsdk.fsf@ice9.digital> (message from Morgan Willcock on Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:54:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316880 Archived-At: > From: Morgan Willcock > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:54:31 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Is there a technical reason why TAGS completion cannot use the value of > >> completion-ignore-case that is set in the buffer where completion is > >> initiated, or is this a bug in the implementation? > > > > If you mean completion when you type "M-.", then this has its own user > > option, tags-case-fold-search. Is that what you want? > > I am talking about completion as initiated by the complete-tag command. > > (Setting tags-case-fold-search to t does not change the result, whether > set buffer-local or globally). Can you show a complete recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the issue? And what version of Emacs is that?