From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master fa4203300fd: Merge remote-tracking branch
 'origin/feature/which-key-in-core'
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:41:13 +0300
Message-ID: <865xu5ov06.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <171873998859.23986.6867742580209068033@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20240618194635.AC606C1FB66@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
 <8734p9z9d0.fsf@gmail.com> <878qz1l6p3.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87y171xqoq.fsf@gmail.com> <87tthpxhto.fsf@gmail.com>
 <868qz1oz7k.fsf@gnu.org> <ZnLfEPJzLmiicri6@tuxteam.de>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="35244"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 16:42:18 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1sJwVt-0008wg-4J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:42:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1sJwV0-0006eh-CM; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:41:22 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1sJwUz-0006eI-Bl
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:41:21 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1sJwUy-00056i-NH; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:41:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=CqzVZ0srCB0BKMdV4whQJBdqWgQQIivjApuw35GVX4w=; b=huyBTgAvubUF
 MX0VhPZz0igoZeFxlMuHFSty7S8bz/PIAKXFl6xqgmQ7WJkwKu/rF5gpOxQBFmk/8nKAoa0IgY5tZ
 EFbUuH2RajKu7qM6i0+OpFboVDgIAdgc4ropT+8rToPQ3eZ4k1+zMkinNnU6WTerfEHchH7Me10XU
 puoy5vuBHG2SlCP/dnKA35etnXb7wViVxDG2BkH8yhgqr0fJucnibHvF2hhcESI59z4hNdItwH11Q
 vGOLhNtYSjXVjDX9EY0lSaoasF3ouUUW/HgPyYu31knohHLURORdpNTfK595VrawGyaVlW5BF2DQ6
 FEt/pmnR8yOKGTWhW7K9bw==;
In-Reply-To: <ZnLfEPJzLmiicri6@tuxteam.de> (tomas@tuxteam.de)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320298
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/320298>

> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:37:20 +0200
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>, philipk@posteo.net,
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From:  <tomas@tuxteam.de>
> 
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 04:10:23PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > What's the downside of doing this unconditionally?
> 
> You mean enabling "which-key" unconditionally?

No, showing keys from other maps.  That's what you were suggesting to
have an option for, no?  The option for turning on and off which-key
already exists, so discussing its necessity sounds redundant, no?