From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:21:35 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <865xtnf1z4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <875xto7lbn.fsf@dancol.org> <86ed8ce2mh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <81b620d7-18a6-4c6e-8517-147a411ee882@gutov.dev> <5ab51946-997e-42ee-b36a-35fd80020fc3@gutov.dev> <87sewrsdit.fsf@amazon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/31.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Dmitry Gutov , "Daniel Colascione" , Stefan Kangas , Stefan Monnier , To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 03 08:31:42 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOtWn-0000Zn-U4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:31:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOtWS-0001hZ-UQ; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:31:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOtWQ-0001c3-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOtWN-0003vB-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A3C11C0005; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 06:31:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87sewrsdit.fsf@amazon.com> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:13:46 -0400") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.197; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay5-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321231 Archived-At: >> Why not C-x w instead? > > I think 4 is slightly easier to hit than w because the former is at the > top of the keyboard and so has a Fitts's law advantage. That said, I > could support C-x w too. I'll change my private bindings and > my patch and see how it goes. We could design a submaps scheme for all windmove commands, e.g.: C-x w - windmove-default-keybindings C-x w 4 - windmove-display-default-keybindings C-x w d - windmove-delete-default-keybindings C-x w m - windmove-swap-states-default-keybindings C-x w s - windmove-split-default-keybindings