Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work

[Joel Reicher <joel.reicher@gmail.com>]

Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> writes:

> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> writes:
>
>> LLMs are able to reason. With the amount of data they will be 
>> -- and probably already are-- much stronger in 
>> reasoning/deduction then humans.
>>
>> LLMs are creativ, constructing new terms from reasoning.
>
> The point of the previous article was to demonstrate that LLMs 
> do not reason, or more particularly, attempt to determine 
> truth. They simply try to calculate what is the next most likely 
> and natural thing you expect to see in a flow of 
> words. Sometimes you get something true out of that, often times 
> you get something that is either false or shallow.

I'm really hesitant to contribute to a thread that's probably 
off-topic, but I'd like to suggest that an LLM's output is perhaps 
best thought of as quoted text, so it is neither true nor false.

The quotes are only removed when a reader reads it.

Regards,

        - Joel