From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Debugging GNU Emacs on MS Windows / getting control back to gdb Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:23:54 +0200 Message-ID: <864m6ej585.fsf@realize.ch> References: <86pop2je7e.fsf@realize.ch> <83wpjaayfs.fsf@gnu.org> <86h9aejcj0.fsf@realize.ch> <83r39iar9z.fsf@gnu.org> <868tvqj5x7.fsf@realize.ch> <83mvk6aq3j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471807510 27069 195.159.176.226 (21 Aug 2016 19:25:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:25:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 21 21:25:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYMk-0006gV-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:25:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37946 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYMi-0003CI-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYMB-0003CD-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYMA-0007HC-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:24:31 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:2379) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYM6-0007FX-Dh; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit ([192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:24:17 +0200 Original-Received: from MYNGB (192.168.66.64) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:23:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mvk6aq3j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2016 22:17:52 +0300") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206733 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > How is this different from "gdb -p PID"? >> >> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that works only once, just after >> attaching to the process. But if I then continue execution, there is no >> way to again suspend the process and return control to GDB. > > No, you misunderstand me. I think when you attach the second GDB, the > first one gets control. No? Hmm. That doesn't work on my machine. Second gdb that I try to attach to the same debugee gets "Can't attach to process" error. And the first gdb instance doesn't notice anything...