From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:49:47 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <864jtztcqs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86a63vi2lu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4a78ffcc-15fb-27ac-48b9-82fe84c596aa@yandex.ru> <86bko9na29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <119c73c2-b219-5ee6-6fb3-c92d7ffea37d@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21207"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 18:52:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p59SQ-0005Nh-GQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:52:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rm-0003IN-OP; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Rk-0003CR-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Ri-0005fY-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Ri-0000qN-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.16709538733228 (code B ref 59935); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 17:51:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Qu-0000q0-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:33393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p59Qs-0000pf-PK for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4058CC000A; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:50:59 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <119c73c2-b219-5ee6-6fb3-c92d7ffea37d@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:37:51 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250870 Archived-At: > Here's an idea: when 'list-buffers-noselect' received a plain list of > buffers in its BUFFER-LIST argument, it doesn't save that anywhere. > > That seems like a bug, doesn't it? That hitting 'g' in such a buffer-list > buffer resets its contents to all buffer (except hidden, etc). > > So it probably makes sense to save it as well. > > Long story short, I suggest to name the new variable > Buffer-menu-buffer-list, and save the value of the BUFFER-LIST argument to > it no matter what. And, likewise, use it. But when the value is a function, > call it to obtain the actual list. Thanks for the idea. Implemented in the commit a99d0e7e6c9. > One side-effect of this, though, is that the BUFFER-LIST argument to > list-buffers--refresh will have no purpose anymore. I'm not sure about removing the old argument BUFFER-LIST from list-buffers--refresh, even though it's an internal function. It also has another argument OLD-BUFFER that could be turned later into buffer-local, to keep the current buffer marker after revert.