From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:49:07 +0300 Message-ID: <864jboyyak.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86il063imh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjqghyd.fsf@gmail.com> <86zfti101u.fsf@gnu.org> <87pluegd4z.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttjp20je.fsf@gnu.org> <87y191fwnd.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyqcfv6k.fsf@gmail.com> <86o79wzi31.fsf@gnu.org> <86mspgza23.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5lgz7qa.fsf@gnu.org> <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18994"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 26 16:50:14 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s0Mtx-0004hN-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:50:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0Msz-0008Rm-UT; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0Msx-0008RG-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0Msx-0008Nt-Be; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:49:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=9oWpiyVAIkFVvtqkHO+7gY80UEwAeCymZ/Nskn5126c=; b=FgJ9joetAsn/rlLakLP6 sB4++qXyVhACeLTGTIsDZ6M2Cebh1sDCiJp6VG+19Dv3r2gOjMBE3/xYbMhzurCXFIRybHzwNZEpp M4fMfPoHO6bBvDJzvSynZr/vPg2LYYozQj9Ssy274xKYBV/mtBXrTTV2ASHud+OmJM2g3q4EtTU8P kdEhFNe060+pyhnv7//cZmnxXTQFS0tHLjDKzcEs4vZZ5gqmlCWUJsstvYaU6SBjNo10ZGSRY1ZMC syKg0fcnTv6GDfD+wZ1tNu1YalnxAoyjvK/upz8D/Tg/iYJWZgJRnREnedSkbyuBDnvA1NbR8noIs f4V5Ah+NP2hXfA==; In-Reply-To: <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:38:20 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318136 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Gerd Möllmann , > eller.helmut@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:38:20 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > In any case, I asked about the downsides of calling igc_postmorten, > > which I think is crucial to understand for making this decision. If > > there are no significant downsides, then doing so is a net win, no? > > Isn't the downside that GC will never function again, and become unsafe > to invoke, after a call to igc_postmortem? With the result that the > debuggee will not be usable as an editor, or indeed operate reliably at > all, after bt is called? Even if that is true, how does this matter after Emacs crashed? Especially if that happened due to MPS assertion violation?