From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:13:14 +0300 Message-ID: <864jbnxoqd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86il063imh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjqghyd.fsf@gmail.com> <86zfti101u.fsf@gnu.org> <87pluegd4z.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttjp20je.fsf@gnu.org> <87y191fwnd.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyqcfv6k.fsf@gmail.com> <86o79wzi31.fsf@gnu.org> <86mspgza23.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5lgz7qa.fsf@gnu.org> <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> <864jboyyak.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6fnxri8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27758"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 09:13:36 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cFc-000753-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:13:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cFK-0005kB-D8; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cFI-0005iC-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cFI-0002Ni-De; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:13:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=7k81FGaeZOswu+ShtA4iopCRWRBBu9INOfINzJ0CZWQ=; b=UF5xbYZHFRWEpvHsy4qc VhhWpLWkBV3PlhkexclPpNnMRvpG3rkQSlPvIpR6lxKVjdREmBWEI9Ad9TkCtwrZmYesPYVZeZ+BN CY9NbGXeL7lJbDL/STKMD2dT7gxjPlG/BRCWDAd0U0gh8bPYnzvTyZmIMFk0xielqqz2SxaKzGD6p AAdFWEybqBzQh1jRu6/3Tu0H6AX/hlI4qqb+gcxH79Vl0VRok6hpiEKPqjzrlU7b7A0HQUNjpGSoI li1+jeBYOIAEIH9cjWwSIbt4m66o/pbBB4QoELRSSJDCHP8FURvrK35+4u0AZbpQQGE2NVD9ydauM tbHaf5ROi1JdBw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:48:17 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318170 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: Po Lu , eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:48:17 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Po Lu > >> Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:21:19 +0800 > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >> > Even if that is true, how does this matter after Emacs crashed? > >> > Especially if that happened due to MPS assertion violation? > >> > >> bt is called in plenty of situations besides an irrecoverable crash. > > > > Which obviously means we should modify "xbacktrace" to notice when > > Emacs has crashed, and act accordingly. > > Would it perhaps be an idea to let emacs_abort put MPS in pm state? Maybe, but not all aborts are GC-related. I think more important is to do this inside SEGV handler.