From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
Cc: jpw@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net, me@eshelyaron.com,
basil@contovou.net, 71927@debbugs.gnu.org,
kickingvegas@gmail.com
Subject: bug#71927: 29.4; ibuffer-do-isearch and ibuffer-do-isearch-regexp not prompting for input
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 21:07:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864j9581zr.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v81l5aal.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Thu, 04 Jul 2024 19:36:34 +0200)
> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>,
> kickingvegas@gmail.com, 71927@debbugs.gnu.org, basil@contovou.net,
> jpw@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 19:36:34 +0200
>
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2024 19:04:42 +0300 Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> FWIW, AFAICT everything is working correctly, it's just that the
> >>>> "Operation finished" message hides the prompt. ibuffer-do-isearch
> >>>> should tell define-ibuffer-op not to display that message, somehow.
> >>>
> >>> I don't see how this could be considered "correct": the "Operation
> >>> finished" message is supposed to be shown only after the Isearch is
> >>> finished in all the marked buffer, not before. It looks like we need
> >>> a function that will not return until all the buffers where searched,
> >>> because that's what define-ibuffer-op expects. Don't you agree?
> >
> > It intentionally uses 'no-recursive-edit' set to t, so ibuffer-do-isearch
> > correctly exits immediately while leaving isearch-mode enabled.
> >
> >> The attached patch appears to DTRT, but I only tested it briefly.
> >> ...
> >> (define-ibuffer-op ibuffer-do-isearch ()
> >> "Perform a `isearch-forward' in marked buffers."
> >> (:interactive ()
> >> - :opstring "searched in"
> >> + :no-opstring t
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. I confirm this is the right thing to do.
> > Maybe instead of :no-opstring would be better to use some special value
> > like :opstring 'no? But I'm not sure if this is better than :no-opstring.
>
> Suppressing the message when :opstring has the value 'no is fine with
> me. If Eli is willing to accept this approach, I can go ahead and
> commit it (to master, presumably, since this is a longstanding issue).
I already said this didn't sound the right solution here, and I
explained why. I'd be interested in hearing counter-arguments, if
there are any.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 21:25 bug#71927: 29.4; ibuffer-do-isearch and ibuffer-do-isearch-regexp not prompting for input Charles Choi
2024-07-04 6:58 ` Juri Linkov
2024-07-04 7:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-04 7:12 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 9:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-04 10:06 ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 12:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-04 13:32 ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-04 15:09 ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 16:04 ` Juri Linkov
2024-07-04 17:36 ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 18:07 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2024-07-04 18:29 ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-04 18:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-06 21:13 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-07 16:59 ` Juri Linkov
2024-07-12 7:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-07-12 10:20 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-12 17:05 ` Charles Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864j9581zr.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=71927@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=basil@contovou.net \
--cc=jpw@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=kickingvegas@gmail.com \
--cc=me@eshelyaron.com \
--cc=stephen.berman@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.