From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp problem 9 of 10: NOT `interactive', but INTERACTIVE! Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:50:56 +0300 Message-ID: <864j7sjmgv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87le14z6xu.fsf@dataswamp.org> <865xs8jpf6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikw8z40y.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14083"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 10 19:52:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1scqGA-0003XZ-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:52:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scqFK-0000Vb-Ez; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scqFJ-0000VT-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scqFI-0004Ao-07; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:51:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CNFjH3TU9q5DeKKHWU38mb/GT1A1TxVaEL0QIauqWwA=; b=ejdYmgt1+GdP nl3YgXFoOfHZRyhYw94ZfVBbNrr/7Zl9CpvvXDRf8Ux/ChHjrwmjHsVPghYKkti3QJctUk1aQqqgC /xWG1vEUBfFA8BIRnBapAuDVNLAxdzo3sc7nGqQQBRq+QQ27Y7t/DWLF8G/RqXcA8pMIpRHxYireZ pL0sz5tW7YRCHfCVyuVw8m9YwCh9Z7VtKOk0ixY8EMdEM6JzwSS4aBZHTlN4RyUvkZYaJBS1BM8tH +sf5Qen93XdGlmJEPN2oQlYGxlUzQOGEhK5664f23xSGykQETAUtt+4ZeH3zR9QyiZRZHGsEBNy5r zxm3Anbt/afGwHxwufX9vQ==; In-Reply-To: <87ikw8z40y.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:22:37 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322623 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:22:37 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Yet do TAB complete in the minibuffer and there are so many > >> functions anyway it is impossible to find anything. > >> Do `apropos-function' for "end-of" you get 212 lines of > >> output, everything from w3m, to slime, to rmail. > > > > You forgot about "C-h a" (apropos-command). > > Indeed, this 'meaningful' distinction is everywhere, it is all > over Emacs, massive. And for a very good reason. > But actually there are 399 lines for C-h a `end-of'. Not here. In "emacs -Q", I get just 21, for 9 commands. Maybe you have apropos-do-all customized to t, in which case "C-h a" will report functions as well, not just commands.