From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [scratch/igc] 985247b6bee crash on Linux, KDE, Wayland
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 22:31:44 +0300
Message-ID: <864j6t3nj3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8734mezkgo.fsf@gmail.com> <m2v7zaw82f.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <8634me447j.fsf@gnu.org> <m2r09yw7a5.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <861q1y437s.fsf@gnu.org> <m2mskmw6ch.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <86wmjq2mr2.fsf@gnu.org> <875xrars34.fsf@protonmail.com>
 <87h6aunilt.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfomqbgk.fsf@protonmail.com>
 <875xrani8k.fsf@gmail.com> <m234me6mxt.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <86cyli2b1r.fsf@gnu.org> <m2seud6gzg.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: execvy@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 05 21:32:45 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1smIDk-0003bW-Cq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:32:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1smID6-0004em-Nv; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:32:20 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1smICq-0004YC-JH
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:31:50 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1smICq-0002OB-9r; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:31:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=AHCS3XflZiLnQw30jKGxTJ4gcZkAGmZWQdNAEIgBKdw=; b=j5OyNGWYKHZk/WEDMmGT
 da6ja1c5jbd9LxJUiXOWWu5zqGKrvPALV7Eb8vV+YarRamT03L+0MwUUbpy5GYO2rqFQn9BpvG0wx
 tPKz+hzR94/Vgee+neMLMi+uvg1zdzO9JiJQtEibala04xakOZn191/pEb2XyUuL6fhhs+XuHlt+7
 bgugnNEirzxK7a3FzZaGzjyHetI60jcAqNqBCCdhaL1x7tV8NfN7vf5Oecfcxr1/SATQzNYlmxly1
 JeKqXmnPReM5mqZmwlrRMm/AQo1PGb9BlDAd32ECyP4wHwS80LFNSu7DeFFKHn3QS7dCpANHvB0O8
 Zhq2RWQQc5h7ew==;
In-Reply-To: <m2seud6gzg.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> (message from Gerd
 =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:24:51 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323434
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/323434>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: execvy@gmail.com,  pipcet@protonmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:24:51 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > If we think that fix_frame can be called for a frame that was deleted,
> > we should test FRAME_LIVE_P, like we do elsewhere.
> >
> > So please fix it in some other way.
> 
> I've pushed something, but I don't know what that FRAME_LIVE_P is about.

A frame that fails the FRAME_LIVE_P is a deleted frame.