From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Discuss new features/enhancements or large changes for users in emacs-devel [was: My resignation from Emacs development] Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 08:00:17 +0200 Message-ID: <864j3o6iz2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <169c6564-4722-4338-a049-5f8f3ce69394@alphapapa.net> <86zflh9myy.fsf@gnu.org> <86cyic7j9c.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11458"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, adam@alphapapa.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 01 07:01:42 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tHd1Z-0002qC-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2024 07:01:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHd0g-0002Pe-Sy; Sun, 01 Dec 2024 01:00:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHd0d-0002PB-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2024 01:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHd0b-0004sJ-V7; Sun, 01 Dec 2024 01:00:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=8UCF0wSPSmKbNcWGA+aNHivU4hNppHAzlfI2opyIXVI=; b=oMqB8ypDURYE 7FFXHE8deMCNLrSAL6KrZr8lZKgoYHxYvDsFUjYCh2YD004fNnZBruACWc5i1qlWMRIJpMOKGsY/n pNSSm6leYDh7PKLGF7dXl50eBT1CI19YJ0hIIRLCzSJfcsIRtwGO1TpInxpbgMf6V+n3og6XpK2lY mdT6WYUZYGHwa12sTlHfsedw5i19SObf4VvBn0QzD7iMbroYupiReu2s9hzRVv46OK0dJDaIa9a1L UAgeUvLK2A4ORZrknnedgczprpfsCZohey3TyEDYKtSb+UZyX8AGo3PTFZM+qBVGUAqMgJSsYRrKW FGZlr9s9xiJqAmOkH19oew==; In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:06:30 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325899 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "rms@gnu.org" , "adam@alphapapa.net" , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:06:30 +0000 > > > > Good to hear. IMO it does happen too often that > > > something that could benefit from discussion on - > > > or at least exposure to - emacs-devel stays on > > > the bug list. > > > > How often is "too often"? Do you have some quantitative data about > > the percentage of such discussions that happen on the bug tracker? > > Too often in my opinion. Too often for what I think > is most helpful and healthy for Emacs. That might be highly subjective, because its in human nature to exaggerate the negative situations over positive ones.