From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: view/edit large files Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:23:49 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <863ae83oai.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86fxiuw6u7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86zlgzqudo.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <86k583p96e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874oz7grs0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <864oz3nyj8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <864oz2l47t.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235157731 24014 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2009 19:22:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:22:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 20:23:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Laaxx-0001E2-SE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:23:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Laawd-0002ck-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaawU-0002ce-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaawR-0002cP-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56236 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaawR-0002cM-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:43 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:59992 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaawR-0004DH-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:43 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LaawL-0006zK-Ly for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:21:38 +0000 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:21:37 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:21:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:j6fnXzeH+ArcH2SgRmw9myAQbD0= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109257 Archived-At: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:56:59 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Is off_t guaranteed to be 64-bit wide? If not, we lose the advantage >> of the floats, no? SM> I wouldn't worry about it for now. This is just a quick patch, barely SM> tested (I wrote it a while ago, but haven't actually used it). "off_t" SM> is what is used by "lseek", so if it's not enough, we need SM> further changes. SM> In any case, this was a mistake: it was only intended to be sent SM> to Ted. We're in pretest, so we shouldn't waste time on such things. Thanks for the information. I will wait until the release to get this discussion going again (I also have the hashtable read support patch waiting for that). Ted