From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:58:50 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <86384qs4o5.fsf@dod.no> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <87384qzxqy.fsf@igel.home> <83bnjen71r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427479202 30614 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2015 18:00:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:00:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 27 18:59:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYXh-0007RV-M1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:59:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51218 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYXh-0006p9-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYXN-0006m4-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYXK-0004tZ-7r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYXK-0004tR-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:59:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YbYX3-000737-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:58:57 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no ([84.208.248.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:58:57 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:58:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:C2tC81LfP9lDIb5g7hWfdfg/EzE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184409 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii : > Isn't it clear, after all the flood of the messages, that Richard has > no use for those advantages? Why cannot he have a VC feature, which > should be optional, to do what he want under certain circumstances and > given specific customizations? This _is_ Emacs, after all, isn't it? I think that having such a feature optional, and not enabled by default, wouldn't be nearly as controversial as having it be the default behaviour. (I doubt there would be many people actually using it, though)