From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-30 baaf97ce1a1: ; Fix some ungrammatical uses of "allows to" Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 09:54:30 +0300 Message-ID: <8634mldvx5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86h6b1ewop.fsf@gnu.org> <87ed65al96.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <86cylpes4c.fsf@gnu.org> <875xrhafqg.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <72715.1725061165@alto.camomileplus.org> <87plpp8bgg.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15605"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kupfer@rawbw.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 31 08:54:51 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1skI0Z-0003tF-IZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 08:54:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skI0K-0003wR-Ud; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:54:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skI0H-0003w6-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skI0G-0003lD-OY; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:54:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=FJCG2BgGYa2R9xaxNafKYmh6XTiTm+wgtgGguoRqWrw=; b=M8CbBKVqQs/r bcpCmUMeAMwnj9CVPjaeTyqywxCbFlPlw170hSLLW97I9GzjuC9wpUKC8Epb1DXsT/WHsC3DsZ1L4 wJPTTsgSYgnv+/r530qFeEnPwddEB6vOUxsm4TAJepSVePyjPT8bUj54TfePkzoox9mfEMZ28Ru4D /iO6wNtj5VQWuN1sfgzGgRe1cgVSe/8hZnNPia248uSafjoWXtZSyxLc1eU6n7QK2Z6j007ItpTrd 77ycHm+l58ZXlJ0Idu1riBN0gG1WXsntAQYBfEoLipTDCm2y31NYRoznqdNNEpJB2tZ1NCrGroll/ zOkMIu9AFwrH+39+yUaDGA==; In-Reply-To: <87plpp8bgg.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:15:27 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323231 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:15:27 +0100 > > On Fri 30 Aug 2024 at 04:39pm -07, Mike Kupfer wrote: > > > I'll take a stab at it. > > Thanks. > > "allows for Xing" reads less well than "allows Xing" to me, but perhaps > Eli will disagree. See my other suggestions: I think the rewording should be more radical. E.g., in this case: lisp/tab-bar.el: A button in the window allows for the restoration of the killed buffer. I'd use something like Pressing a button in the window restores the killed buffer. or You can press a button in the window to restore the killed buffer.