From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add facility to collect stderr of async subprocess Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:46:12 +0200 Message-ID: <861szv2nfv.fsf@realize.ch> References: <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <83egomxog1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ego5tjgt.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftno4fr.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <55247A98.5020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83r3rvgn4e.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftja89d.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87wphnwh2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475657276 5148 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2016 08:47:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:47:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 10:47:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brhrc-0008WM-UI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:47:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brhrb-0004RK-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 04:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brhqz-0004RF-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 04:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brhqz-0001y6-2d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 04:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:4417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brhqs-0001uy-Cp; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 04:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (Unknown [192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch with ESMTP ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:46:45 +0200 Original-Received: from myngb (192.168.250.224) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:46:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:54:34 +0300") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207995 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tino Calancha >> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:33:17 +0900 >> Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com >> >> How about to allow direct standard-error output to a different buffer >> in start-process as well? > > This proposal has a disadvantage of being confusingly similar to what > call-process provides, except that there the cdr is a file name, not a ^^^ FWIW, the cAdr is the file name, I think. DESTINATION in call-process is a list and not a single cons cell, if I read doc and code correctly. > buffer. Alain